Peters lab

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Home Research
Research


Welcome to the Peters lab!

E-mail Print PDF
Wurrim

Our research interests

We are evolutionary geneticists, interested in questions of how the interactions among genes evolve, and how those interactions in turn affect processes of evolution. Our work has both empirical and theoretical components, and one of our constant goals is to integrate the two as much as possible, so that theoretical results generate predictions for experiments, while experimental results help focus future theoretical work.

We have three main areas of research, outlined below, all of which relate to several very general questions in evolutionary biology, in particular:

  • How does an individual's genotype map onto its fitness?
  • To what extent does the environment, both biotic and abiotic, affect the fitness of some genotypes relative to others?
  • How do the molecular details of genomic processes affect the evolution of those processes?
Ships that pass in the night

The evolution of recombination rates in laboratory populations of the roundworm Caenorhabditis elegans

Because the effective recombination rate of C. elegans can be manipulated at several levels, we are able to test evolutionary models of recombination by exposing populations with different recombination rates to environmental or genetic perturbations that would be predicted to provide an advantage to recombination. For example, one broad class of models predicts that populations with high recombination rates should adapt more quickly to novel environments. If fitness increases more rapidly in high-recombination populations of C. elegans than in low-recombination populations when both are subjected to the same new environment, then this class of models is supported. Molecular approaches for determining what loci are involved in adaptation can then be applied to help determine what specific processes are involved in providing an advantage to recombination.

The evolution of fitness via compensatory mutations in C. elegans

If a genotype has had its fitness reduced due to mutations, is it more likely to encounter mutations at other loci that increase its fitness? In other words, can mutations, which might otherwise be neutral or deleterious, increase fitness by compensating for the disadvantageous effects of mutations at other loci? How common are such "compensatory mutations;" what are their effects; and to what extent do their effects depend on the genetic specifics of the original fitness-reducing mutations? The answer to this question has implications for our understanding of the degree to which genomes are integrated, which in turn informs our understanding of processes like speciation and the evolution of sex. In addition, this question has implications for species conservation, since endangered populations are expected to accumulate fitness-reducing mutations; if such populations have a high rate of compensatory mutation, they may be more likely to survive than we originally thought. We address such questions by allowing strains of C. elegans that are "knockouts" at arbitrarily chosen loci (i.e., they've had stretches of protein-coding DNA excised completely) to evolve. Any increases in fitness are then due to compensatory mutations at other loci. Using a combination of statistical and genetic approaches, we can estimate the numbers and effects of compensatory mutations across large numbers of lines.

Theoretical models of the evolution of sex and recombination

alt

We use computer simulation as well as numerical and analytical approaches to achieve two ends: (1) to generate experimentally useful predictions from the wide array of models currently available to explain sex and recombination; and (2) to integrate these models into a common, modern model framework -- a stochastic framework explicitly considering the probability of fixation of alleles that affect the rate of sex or recombination.

Our primary theoretical focus of late is on the evolution of recombination hotspots, which pose a long-standing paradox in evolutionary genetics. Most crossover events in many eukaryotes appear to occur at relatively small locations in the genome -- "recombination hotspots." If these hotspots are defined by the DNA sequence at the hotspots themselves, they are expected to recombine themselves out of existence, since recombination appears to be initiated by the conversion of the sequence on one chromatid by sequence on the homologous chromatid. If, as appears to be the case, hot alleles are preferentially converted by their cold homologues in heterozygotes, hotspots should "drive" themselves out of existence. We are exploring ways around this paradox, particularly through the combination of hotspot control by the sequence at the hotspot itself and by sequence elsewhere in the genome. We are also interested in exploring to what extent this discrete, hotspot-controlled mechanism of recombination constrains the evolution of broader scale recombination rates.

 

Publications

E-mail Print PDF

Peters, A. D.  2008.  A combination of cis and trans control can solve the hotspot conversion paradox.  Genetics 178:  1579–1593.

Haag, E. S., H. Chamberlin, A. Coghlan, D. H. A. Fitch, A. D. Peters, & H. Schulenburg.  2007.  Caenorhabditis evolution:  If they all look alike, you aren’t looking hard enough!  Trends in Genetics 23:  101–104.

Peters, A. D. & C. M. Lively.  2007.  Short- and long-term benefits and detriments to recombination under antagonistic coevolution.  Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20:  1206-1217.

Halligan, D. L., A. D. Peters, & P. D. Keightley.  2003.  Inferring the distribution of the effects of EMS-induced mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetical Research 82:  191 – 205.

Peters, A. D, D. L. Halligan, M. C. Whitlock, & P. D. Keightley.  2003.  Dominance and overdominance of mildly deleterious induced mutations for fitness traits in Caenorhabditis elegansGenetics 165:  589 – 599.

Whitlock, M. C., C. K. Griswold, & A. D. Peters.  2003.  Compensating for the meltdown:  The critical effective size of a population with deleterious and compensatory mutations.  Annales Zoologici Fennici 40:  169-183.

Peters, A. D., & S. P. Otto.  2003.  Liberating genetic variance through sex.  Bioessays 25:  533-537.

Peters, A. D. & P. D. Keightley.  2000.  A test for epistasis among induced mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 156:  1635 – 1647.

West, S. A. & A. D. Peters.  2000.  Paying for sex is not easy. Nature 407:  962.

Keightley, P. D., E. K. Davies, A. D. Peters, & R. G. Shaw.  2000.  Properties of ethylmethane sulfonate-induced mutations affecting life-history traits in Caenorhabditis elegans and inferences about bivariate distributions of mutation effects.  Genetics 156:  143 – 154.

Peters, A. D. & C. M. Lively.  2000.  Epistasis and the maintenance of sex.  Pages 99 – 112 in Epistasis and the Evolutionary Process (J. B. Wolf, E. D. Brodie III, and M. J. Wade, Eds.).  Oxford University  Press, Oxford.

Davies, E. K., A. D. Peters, & P. D. Keightley.  1999  High frequency of cryptic deleterious mutations in Caenorhabditis elegansScience 285:  1748 – 1751.

Peters, A. D. & C. M. Lively.  1999.  The Red Queen and fluctuating epistasis:  a population genetic analysis of antagonistic coevolution. American Naturalist 154:  393 – 405.

Jokela, J., C. M. Lively,  J. Taskinen, & A. D. Peters.  1999.  Effect of starvation on parasite-induced mortality in a freshwater snail (Potamopyrgus antipodarum).  Oecologia 119:  320 – 325.

Peters, A. D.  1999.  The effects of mutation and pathogen infection on life-history characters in Arabidopsis thaliana. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 12:  460 – 470.

Lively, C. M., E. J. Lyons, A. D. Peters, & J. Jokela.  1998.  Competitive stress and the maintenance of sex.  Evolution 52:  1482 – 1486.

West, S. A., A. D. Peters, & N. H. Barton.  1998.  Testing for epistasis between deleterious mutations.  Genetics 149:  435 – 444.

Gross, K. L., A. Peters, & K. S. Pregitzer.  1993.  Fine root growth and demographic responses to nutrient patches in four old-field plant species.  Oecologia 95:  61 – 64.